유다서: 주해와 설교 on Windows Pc

Various Comment: commentary on Jude, they are pretty much Publishing. Nevertheless, what is the reason for another one comment from Jude? Therefore I would like to explain to you the moment. All books are subject, and the contents are organized around the subject. Tin is also true. A comment Greco-in access to Jude text about the background of the Roman era, around the common and the reason of the B notes Peter, around the point of connection and disconnection points and C notes Book of Enoch, D annotation organizations theological perspective a, E annotations in the history of theological point of view, mainly applied for the F annotation modern church members, and access to Jude text around the G comments language studies. What is the true reason for this comment yitorok various thoughts? Although a variety of reasons, the most fundamental reason is because you can not hold the tin everything. The emphasis vary from author and different bars that are different gifts, seek. So geotyijiyo shedding brush to build content around one major theme of each comment. Saints do not read just one comment to you is why you must read throughout throughout multiple comments. (Gyesipnida well as those who shed his brush to express their written comments to the other party and a different perspective. I also another reason that must read a lot of comments.)


I attribute this comment: So I do have a comment which features introduced through bongeul? In short, "Jude commented to help you analyze and apply the preaching of the Greek original," and other words and hold "UBS5 Jude, what is the most reasonable of the various interpretive be looking at the same time proposed interpretation of the case by analyzing the syntax of the original readers find nagamyeo with, and also is the author of Jude comment "to introduce a methodology for constructing a sermon based on the original text proposed by the preaching part to emphasize over the grammar is applied. Because the comments written for the purpose of this topic on the market, but a lot of hesitation to first try regard to ear the Greek text, I wanted to introduce just these kinds of comments in Korea Church as pastor realized the importance of preaching through the ministry urgently.

Characteristics of the comments II: The Many think seminarians are as follows: "After studying the Bible, the Greek grammatical analysis of the original text, and ought to apply to the sermon!" However, students rarely carry this idea into reality. I throw most abandoned midway. Any ideas why? This is because a too large gap between ideals and reality. Studying the original text after studying all the Greek grammar It is not ideal, but I think never realistic. Inconsistency of grammatical understanding of merchandise between the grammarian, of course, because that itself is impossible to study the grammar, because it is called a human limitations. Therefore, the most realistic approach is to analyze the original text by studying the grammar and syntax while analyzing the original study. As you studied in this way it is that sinabeuro exposed to organic relationship between grammar and text, and, finally began to understand jidaga get used to investigate the relationship between the two. Malyijiyo like manner as if we were coming for a long time to learn English. I am reminded by the comments this this fact, but this through by giving attention to the Greek readers to abandoned long ago to try to "preach parallelism grammar - the original" beyond the ideal framework of the "former grammar - After preaching theory - of the original." bosigireul wanted recommended. To this end, Jude was perfect. Yijiyo because because the dock has the following characteristics:

First, the short. In the Epistles is a very reasonable amount of sections 25 to test the "grammar preaching parallelism - the original." In other words, the length injira perfect grammar to illuminate the macroscopic and microscopic part of the framework of the epistles I can finish the Walkthrough with readers from the beginning. Not boring, not too malyijiyo seounhaji!

The two appeared in the second, Jude was too much like the two of you foresee a positive current bruises Church in Korea. Even as if he is the author of Jude thinking about them, and shed the brush is similar enough to not be an exaggeration. So let the readers to study the annotation to face reality. Secretly coming acts in the church to hide his identity, actions create your own party by complaining to the established church, is created, the act of blasphemy and order of the Church, what more illusion than words, a higher authority, such as rise in the world per placing such acts as are now so similar to the aspect of spiritual warfare facing the church in Korea. Jude has given directions by vividly presenting how beolyeoya the fight against these parties to go forth to our lives today. (See Appendix at the bottom!)

There are a variety of Bible published in Hangul: Characteristics III of this comment NIV, NASB, KJV, Bible, the modern and the like. If you've never seen them compared to you know, quite often the phrase is translated as different. How can that be? This comment was explaining why grammatically, I've wanted to show the fluidity of the translation framework that can be made through a translation from the Greek original by introducing a direct translation. And I tried to look with what is the most reasonable translation awareness of them.

Limitations of this comment: "to organize the preaching around the UBS5 Greek manuscripts" theme of this comment is the same as that put flesh on the bones, without muscles. To preach deuryeotjiman explained above grammar is, of course, should refer to the background knowledge, organic relationship, and word study such as with other epistles. Geotyijiyo lack of understanding but it is just syntax. But he also noted that holds all know it is not possible to comment, everything. This comment also can not escape these limitations. But I introduced the book in reference to a bibliography to see a little less gaping gap between the bone and flesh, and the reader is introduced by a footnote may be helpful. Moreover, by this tin middle briefly Zhuhai helper, the term assistant, copy assistant, assistant doctrine, preaching, etc. added to the helper I've tried so readability is not too awkward. However, we found it did not spend a lot of ground to the rest of the helper except Zhuhai assistant, helper terms possible to save a unique approach to the grammatical subject of the comment in advance.

Nagamyeo: For the correct interpretation analysis of the grammar of the text by presenting a number of different analytical case, most of the fair to apply the considered interpret the sermon the way that comments are the first of them injira may be readers awkward to strange lot. However, if you walkthrough from beginning to end with me I will think that there will be a big help. Considers important to the Greek text, we sincerely hope to understand the grammatical comments that those who think it necessary to construct the framework of the sermon can be a small amount of help. Thank you!

Author: Transactions Rev. (Dallas Theological Seminary)